Sequence Identity Calculator
Calculate percent identity, similarity, and evolutionary distance between biological sequences.
Identity, Similarity and Why They Differ
Two sequences can be compared at different levels of strictness, and the terms are not interchangeable.
| Measure | Counts | Typical relationship |
|---|---|---|
| Identity | Exact matches only | Always the lower figure |
| Similarity | Matches plus conservative substitutions | Higher — leucine for isoleucine counts |
| Coverage | Fraction of length aligned | Independent of both |
Similarity uses a substitution matrix such as BLOSUM62, which scores biochemically conservative swaps positively. A leucine-to-isoleucine change preserves hydrophobicity and usually structure, so it counts toward similarity but not identity.
The Twilight Zone
| Identity | Interpretation | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| > 70% | Almost certainly same function | Very high |
| 30–70% | Homologous, likely related function | High |
| 20–35% | Twilight zone | Ambiguous |
| < 20% | Cannot infer homology from identity alone | Low |
Below roughly 30% identity, sequences that share structure and function become statistically indistinguishable from unrelated pairs. This is why E-value matters more than percent identity for distant relationships — it accounts for alignment length and database size, so a 25% identity match over 400 residues can be far more significant than 45% over 30.
Coverage is the other essential number. High identity over a short stretch may reflect a shared domain rather than overall relatedness, so identity should always be reported alongside the aligned length.
Worked Examples
Common Mistakes
High identity over a short alignment may reflect one shared domain. The aligned length is essential context for interpreting the percentage.
Below about 30%, homologous and unrelated pairs overlap statistically. E-value or structural comparison is needed to distinguish them.
Similarity counts conservative substitutions and is always higher. Quoting one while meaning the other overstates or understates relatedness.
BLOSUM62 suits moderately diverged sequences; BLOSUM45 is better for distant relationships and BLOSUM80 for close ones. The choice changes the alignment.