Protein Extinction Coefficient Calculator

Calculate molar extinction coefficient and protein concentration from amino acid composition.

cystine pairs, not free Cys
Please check your inputs and try again.

Where the Coefficients Come From

Protein absorbance at 280 nm comes almost entirely from three species, and the Pace method sums their individual contributions.

ε280 = (nW × 5500) + (nY × 1490) + (nC × 125)
Residueε at 280 nmContribution
Tryptophan5,500Dominant
Tyrosine1,490Secondary
Cystine (disulfide)125Minor
Phenylalanine~0 at 280Absorbs at 257 nm

Tryptophan contributes nearly four times as much as tyrosine per residue, so a protein lacking tryptophan has a low extinction coefficient and A280 becomes an unreliable way to measure it. Some proteins have no tryptophan or tyrosine at all and are effectively invisible at 280 nm.

Note that cystine, not cysteine, contributes. Free thiols absorb negligibly, so the coefficient differs between reduced and oxidised forms of the same protein — typically a 2–5% difference.

Accuracy and Its Limits

The Pace method is accurate to roughly 5% for folded proteins and rather better for denatured ones, because the local environment of aromatic residues shifts their absorbance slightly. Buried tryptophans absorb differently from exposed ones.

InterferenceEffectHandling
Nucleic acidStrongly inflates A280Check A260/A280 ratio
Scattering from aggregatesRaises apparent absorbanceSubtract A320 baseline
Haem or other cofactorsAbsorb at 280Use a cofactor-corrected coefficient

The A260/A280 ratio is the standard purity check. Pure protein gives about 0.57 and pure DNA about 1.8 — so even a few percent nucleic acid contamination raises the ratio noticeably and inflates the apparent protein concentration.

Turbidity from aggregates scatters light across the spectrum. Since protein does not absorb at 320 nm, any reading there indicates scattering and should be subtracted from A280 before calculating concentration.

Worked Examples

Example 1: BSA: W=2, Y=21, C=17 (17 disulfides)
ε=2×5500+21×1490+17×125
Result: ε=44,415 M⁻¹cm⁻¹ (lit: 43,824)
Close to literature value
Example 2: GFP variant: W=1, Y=4, C=0
ε=5500+5960
Result: ε=11,460 M⁻¹cm⁻¹
But chromophore absorbs much more at 488nm
Example 3: A protein invisible at 280
Sequence with no Trp and no Tyr
Result: ε near zero
A280 cannot measure it. Use a colorimetric assay such as BCA or Bradford, or measure at 205 nm where the peptide bond absorbs.
Example 4: Detecting nucleic acid
A260/A280 = 1.2 rather than 0.57
Result: Significant contamination
Nucleic acid inflates A280 substantially. Protein concentration calculated without correction would be considerably overestimated.

Common Mistakes

⚠️
Using A280 for a protein without tryptophan

Tryptophan dominates the coefficient. Proteins lacking it have low ε and poor sensitivity; some have none and are invisible at 280 nm.

⚠️
Ignoring nucleic acid contamination

Nucleic acids absorb strongly at 280 and inflate apparent protein concentration. Check the A260/A280 ratio, which should be near 0.57 for pure protein.

⚠️
Counting cysteines rather than cystines

Only disulfide-bonded cystine contributes. The coefficient differs between reduced and oxidised forms of the same protein.

⚠️
Not subtracting a scattering baseline

Aggregates scatter light and raise apparent absorbance. Protein does not absorb at 320 nm, so any signal there should be subtracted.

Frequently Asked Questions

Pace method accuracy?
Overestimates ε by ~2-4% because assumes all aromatic residues fully exposed. Denatured protein (6M GuHCl) gives more accurate ε. For native protein, ε ± 5-10%. Better methods: amino acid analysis, quantitative amino acid sequencing.
A260/A280 for purity?
Pure protein: A260/A280 ≈ 0.57. Ratio >0.7: nucleic acid contamination. Pure DNA: A260/A280 ≈ 1.8. RNA: ≈ 2.0. Use A260 for DNA/RNA (ε260 = 50 μg/mL/OD for dsDNA).
Why does tryptophan dominate the coefficient?
Its extinction coefficient at 280 nm is 5,500 compared with 1,490 for tyrosine — nearly four times higher per residue.
How accurate is the Pace method?
About 5% for folded proteins and better for denatured ones, since the local environment of aromatic residues shifts absorbance slightly.
What A260/A280 ratio indicates pure protein?
Approximately 0.57. Values approaching 1.8 indicate substantial nucleic acid contamination.
How do I measure a protein with no aromatic residues?
Use a colorimetric assay such as BCA or Bradford, or measure absorbance at 205 nm where the peptide backbone absorbs.