FST and Genetic Distance Calculator
Calculate FST, genetic distance, and population differentiation from allele frequencies.
What FST Actually Compares
FST asks how much of the total genetic variation lies between populations rather than within them. It is a proportion, bounded by 0 and 1.
| FST | Differentiation | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 0–0.05 | Little | Populations connected by gene flow |
| 0.05–0.15 | Moderate | Human continental groups ≈ 0.10–0.15 |
| 0.15–0.25 | Great | Long-isolated populations |
| > 0.25 | Very great | Approaching separate species |
The human figure is worth stating carefully: roughly 85–90% of human genetic variation exists within populations, and only 10–15% between them. This is Lewontin's classic finding and it is why FST is often cited in discussions of human genetic diversity.
Migration and the One-Migrant Rule
Rearranging gives a striking result: about one migrant per generation is enough to prevent substantial differentiation, regardless of population size. One effective migrant gives FST near 0.20; ten give about 0.024.
The reason it is independent of population size is that drift is stronger in small populations but a single migrant also represents a larger fraction of them. The two effects cancel. This underpins conservation guidance on connectivity between fragmented habitats.
Limitations
| Issue | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Depends on within-population diversity | Highly variable markers give lower FST ceilings |
| Single number for complex structure | Cannot show direction or timing of gene flow |
| Assumes equilibrium | Recent divergence is not at migration-drift balance |
Because FST is bounded by within-population heterozygosity, highly polymorphic markers such as microsatellites cannot reach high values even between completely isolated populations. Standardised measures such as G″ST and Jost's D address this, which is why modern studies often report several alongside each other.
Worked Examples
Common Mistakes
Highly variable markers have a lower maximum FST. Microsatellite and SNP values from the same populations are not directly comparable.
It partitions variance between populations. Individuals from different populations are frequently more similar than two from the same one.
Recently diverged populations have not reached balance, so the one-migrant relationship does not apply and FST underestimates isolation.
It gives no information about direction of gene flow, timing of divergence, or which loci drive the differentiation.