CRISPR Efficiency Calculator

Calculate CRISPR on-target efficiency, indel frequency, and guide RNA scoring.

Please check your inputs and try again.

Editing Efficiency Versus Knockout Efficiency

These are different numbers and confusing them is the most common error in CRISPR analysis. Editing efficiency is the fraction of alleles carrying any indel. Knockout efficiency is the fraction carrying a frameshift.

Indels come in all sizes, and only those not divisible by three shift the reading frame. Roughly one third of random indels are in-frame, so they alter the protein without abolishing it.

Indel sizeFrame effectProtein outcome
1, 2, 4, 5 bpFrameshiftPremature stop — likely knockout
3, 6, 9 bpIn-frameResidues removed; protein may still function

So an 80% editing efficiency corresponds to roughly 53% frameshift alleles. A population reported as "80% edited" may contain a substantial fraction of functional protein.

Why Nonsense-Mediated Decay Matters

A premature stop codon usually triggers nonsense-mediated decay, degrading the transcript — which is what makes frameshifts effective knockouts. But if the stop falls in the last exon or within about 50 nucleotides of the final exon junction, NMD is not triggered and a truncated protein may be produced.

That truncated protein can retain function, or occasionally act as a dominant negative. This is why guides are normally targeted to early constitutive exons rather than wherever the best-scoring protospacer happens to be.

Guide design factorTarget
GC content40–60%
Target exonEarly, constitutive, all isoforms
Off-target scoreMinimise; check genome-wide
Distance to PAMCut site 3 bp upstream of PAM

Validation matters as much as design. TIDE and ICE infer indel spectra from Sanger traces and are quick, but amplicon deep sequencing gives the actual distribution — and for any claim of knockout, protein-level confirmation by western blot is the standard.

Worked Examples

Example 1: Good guide: 350/1000 indels
Efficiency=35% — moderate
Result: Optimize delivery or guide design
Screen multiple guides per target
Example 2: Excellent result: 750/1000
75% efficiency
Result: Optimal for most applications
Clone or sort to get pure KO population
Example 3: Editing versus knockout
80% of alleles carry indels
Result: Roughly 53% frameshifted
Two thirds of indels shift the frame. The remaining in-frame alleles may produce near-functional protein, so the effective knockout rate is well below the editing rate.
Example 4: Why exon choice matters
Guide targeting the final exon
Result: NMD not triggered
Premature stops within about 50 nucleotides of the last exon junction escape degradation, leaving a truncated protein that may retain activity.

Common Mistakes

⚠️
Reporting editing efficiency as knockout efficiency

About a third of indels are in-frame and do not abolish the protein. An 80% edited population is roughly 53% frameshifted.

⚠️
Targeting a late exon

A premature stop in the final exon escapes nonsense-mediated decay, so a truncated and possibly functional protein is produced. Target early constitutive exons.

⚠️
Skipping protein-level validation

Indel frequency does not prove protein loss. Western blot or functional assay is needed to confirm knockout.

⚠️
Ignoring in-frame indels entirely

They can still disrupt function if they remove catalytic or binding residues, and can occasionally produce dominant negatives.

Frequently Asked Questions

ICE vs TIDE analysis?
ICE (Inference of CRISPR Edits, Synthego): deconvolutes mixed Sanger sequencing chromatogram. TIDE: same principle, different algorithm. Both give % editing and indel spectrum without deep sequencing. NGS (amplicon-seq): more accurate, detects rare edits.
Guide design rules?
20nt guide (5'-N20-NGG-3' for SpCas9). Avoid: >4 consecutive T (RNAPIII terminator), extreme GC (<20% or >80%), off-target prediction (CRISPOR, Benchling). Target early in coding sequence, exons shared by all isoforms. Avoid repetitive sequences.
What is the difference between editing and knockout efficiency?
Editing efficiency counts all indels; knockout efficiency counts only frameshifts. Roughly one third of indels are in-frame and do not abolish the protein.
Why target early exons?
Because a premature stop codon in a late exon escapes nonsense-mediated decay, allowing a truncated and potentially functional protein to be made.
What GC content should a guide have?
Around 40 to 60%. Very low GC reduces binding stability while very high GC can increase off-target activity and impair unwinding.
Is indel frequency enough to confirm knockout?
No. Protein-level validation by western blot or a functional assay is required, since in-frame indels and NMD escape can preserve function.